Four key benefits of Open RAN and whether “open” matters

This article outlines 4 key benefits of three open RAN technologies (vRAN, C-RAN, open-RAN) and evaluates whether these benefits are contingent on operators deploying a fully disaggregated RAN – i.e., “open-RAN”, with an open, disaggregated interface between the BBU and the RRU.

This article is the third in a series exploring the topic of open RAN, preceded by Why do open RAN? C-RAN, vRAN & open-RAN and What is open RAN and where are we at in 2021? 

The benefits of deploying open RAN have been a contentious topicProponents of open-RAN tout its potential to help telcos avoid vendor lock-in and allow an operator or system integrator to assemble “best of breed” network components from a multi-vendor ecosystem. For open-RAN sceptics, including some network equipment vendors (NEPs), the downsides are clear: using open-source code without established safeguards and standardisation practices may expose the network to security vulnerabilitiesand the added burden on operators to act as “system integrator” will undo any CapEx savings that RAN disaggregation has offered in the first place. Ericsson, one of the big three vendors, expects as little as 3% Open RAN-specified offerings by 2025, highlighting ongoing challenges around intellectual property rights and interoperability that must be resolved before the technology sees massive uptake.  

Disaggregated open RAN may be the ultimate ambition for operators, but open-RAN deployments are still nascent and its full benefits may not be realised until 6G. For many operators, vRAN will serve as a stepping stone in the near term. As a result, this article will outline 4 benefits of Open RAN technologies (C-RAN, vRAN, open-RAN) and evaluate whether these benefits are contingent on operators deploying a fully disaggregated RAN – i.e., “open-RAN”, with an open, disaggregated interface between the BBU and the RRU.

 Maximising the 4 key benefits of open RAN 

 

1.Diversify the supplier ecosystem 

This is arguably open RAN’s biggest claim – the potential to enable telcos to avoid vendor lock-in by replacing vendor-proprietary interfaces with a fully disaggregated RAN based on open standards. It should be stressed that with open-RAN the functions themselves remain proprietary. Open-RAN should not be confused with opensource.  

C-RAN and vRAN still boast significant improvements to legacy RAN. As open-RAN is implemented at a larger scale in macro networks, the benefits of a truly white-box solution may be offset by the difficult process of having to integrate open-RAN components with proprietary RAN technology, such as the radio portion of the network, as was the case with Rakuten Mobile’s 4G open RAN deployment. This explains why, in the near term, we will continue to see incumbent vendors offering ready-made vRAN stacks with pre-integrated proprietary software as a trade-off between flexibility and reliability/compatibility with legacy networks and management. 

2. Introduce new innovation models 

Open RAN opens new avenues of service innovation and agility for telcos by breaking the RAN up into component parts, each of which can be separately reconfigured. O-RAN standards are freely accessible to all third-party software developers, who can develop new types oservices  and innovate on the RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC) by building xApps and rAppsThis enables telcos to make their networks a much more relevant resource for both enterprise and consumer applications.  

Without the open, standards-based fronthaul interface offered by open-RAN, operators have little scope to evolve disaggregated RAN components in-house in a DevOps manner, and take control of shaping new network features and use cases. 

3. Lower total cost of ownership (TCO) 

Automation will be key to managing the lifecycle of disaggregated, cloud-native RAN functionsOpen RAN can bring down the network TCO  e.g., energy use, resource distributionoperations –  by evolving the network in a continuous integration/ continuous delivery (CI/CD) manner rather than through generational investment cycles. One APAC operator described automation and a DevOps approach as being essential to their ability to roll out a greenfield open RAN network and accelerate 4G site commissioning from 3-4 days to 8 minutes. 

In terms of hardware, centralisation and virtualisation can reduce deployment, operation, and maintenance costs of physical equipment at base stations. By consolidating baseband processing, C-RAN deploys lower volumes of expensive physical kit than legacy RAN, and improves energy efficiency by eliminating under-used capacity of idle network equipment and implementing centralised management tools.

Virtualised BBUs (vBBUs) can intelligently adjust network loads to limited physical infrastructure and reduce the proportion of redundant equipment operating below capacityBoth vRAN and open-RAN host baseband processing in commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) servers, which are readily available and cost-efficient compared to vendor-proprietary baseband hardware. The interoperability of openRAN components further allows telcos to deploy to varied sites in a resource-efficient manner because the same vBBUs can interchange between radio type (macro, small, micro cells), vendor, mobile generation, or spectrum.  

 4. Unlock new revenue opportunities in private cellular networks and shared/wholesale neutral hosting

Recent CBRS shared spectrum auctions suggest that private LTE networks for enterprises will rapidly advance in 2021. Telcos can customise RAN hardware and software in an open-RAN deployment to deliver bespoke features based on the enterprise use case and deployment scenario. For instance, they may incorporate additional security or system integration with a management layer. As the network architecture is software-based, operators can prioritize specific locations with targeted upgrades (e.g., URLLC capabilities for industrial campuses) without requiring a massive macro-level license upgrade.  

Private cellular networks also serve as an opportunity for telecoms operators to build expertise and experience in operating the open RAN in a smaller-scale confined environment, which will be key when deployments are extended to the macro network. Find out more about how operators can benefit from virtualising private LTE networks in STL’s articlePrivate LTE: new business model opportunity for vRAN. 

Figure 2Comparing 4 key benefits of open RAN 

Open RAN benefits

How should operators deploy open RAN? 

To find out more about Open RAN and different deployment roadmaps for telcos, check out STL Partner’s Open RAN: What should telcos do? report. 

Author: Michelle Lo is a consultant at STL Partners, specialising in telco cloud, network automation and edge computing.

Telco Cloud insights pack

This 24-page document will provide you with a summary of our insights from our virtualisation research and consulting work:

  • Overview of Telco Cloud deployments worldwide
  • Benefits of telco cloud: state of the industry
  • Deployment approaches: implications and challenges
  • How STL Partners can support you

Just click on the button below to request your free pack.

 

Read more about Telco Cloud, Cloud Native, NFV & SDN

Research

NFV goes mainstream: How cloud-native is contributing to growth

The number of deployments of NFV and SDN continues to grow – but while some markets are moving on to the next phase, others are just getting going.

Read more

Research

Open RAN: What should telcos do?

Alongside the roll-out of 5G cores and radios, the Radio Access Network (RAN) is evolving to a more open, virtualised and distributed architecture. What are the opportunities and risks for telcos?

Register now

Research

Telco Cloud: Why it hasn’t delivered, and what must change for 5G

Telco cloud made big promises for the transformation of telecoms. It is a fundamental enabler for 5G and the exciting opportunities ahead. Why hasn’t it delivered yet – and what needs to change?

Read more