Why the telco industry is revisiting convergence
Convergence in networks has been pursued for many years to varying degrees but operators have often pursued divergence to support the speed and need for innovation at the expense of convergence. We explore what has changed and why the balance of forces has now shifted in favour of convergence.
Cloud native and disaggregation have shifted the balance of forces towards convergence
Communications service providers (CSPs) have consistently explored and sporadically pursued convergence over many years but they have always had to navigate the balancing act between the forces of convergence and divergence. Convergence has been part of the pursuit of simplification while divergence was seen as a means of innovation, given the need for speed and challenges with specificity in the traditional appliance-based world. This often meant that it was easier and quicker to deploy isolated islands to quickly address customer opportunities at the expense of any convergence efforts.
However, the advent of cloud native operating practices and increasing disaggregation means that CSPs no longer have to compromise between convergence and the need to support innovation, and move towards having a common network that serves diverse needs. By enabling operators to decouple and recombing various building blocks, disaggregation can separate and reduce any interdependencies while highlighting potential commonalities and areas that make convergence more viable.
Source: STL Partners
The renewed pursuit of convergence is driven by both internal and external drivers
Through our research with CSPs globally, we identified four main drivers for why CSPs have renewed their interest and pursuit of convergence:
Source: STL Partners
1. Reducing total cost of ownership (TCO) through simplification and consolidation
- Reducing duplication in capital deployment, better resource utilisation, economies of scale
- Easier to assure and manage, common infrastructure and management toolset
- Seamless foundation for other solutions on the network
2. Enabling greater control, resilience and automation
- Ability to navigate greater network intricacy: Enabling mass scale visibility, greater automation and E2E control of the network for easier operations
- Creating the basis for infrastructure-agnostic service design (e.g. access agnostic) for third parties
3. Creating a sustainable platform for massive data growth
- Maximising use of infrastructure to support volume expansion and high performance demands
- Extract greater synergies from access fibre to reduce own environmental footprint as part of greater emphasis on sustainability (see more in our report here)
4. Supporting greater innovation and ecosystem development
- Creating the basis to deliver customer-specific services (e.g. via network slicing) with ability to define, manage, deliver and route app-specific services end-to-end
- Exposing network programmability and capabilities to customers and partners to support requirements
…but convergence is multi-faceted and the pursuit is not without its challenges
Convergence should not be seen as just a technology decision but a fundamental strategic one. The demands on the network and from customers of all shapes and sizes are only going to increase. CSPs are also under pressure from new types of ‘co-opetition’ (e.g. the hyperscalers, greenfield operators, other digital players) to respond much faster to market and customer demands. Therefore, they need to be able to handle these demands and accelerate the beat rate of innovation in a way that provides greater operational simplicity, cost effectiveness and agility. Or be at risk of their market share and value eroding as a result.
The drivers for convergence as a broader concept are clear. However, through our research, we found different definitions of what exactly the term convergence means to CSPs. Furthermore, CSPs are also taking different approaches in pursuing convergence. In our report, we explore the following key questions:
- What are the different dimensions of convergence? How are these related to one another and how do these (in different combinations) enable CSPs to address the four key drivers?
- What strategies and approaches are different types of operators pursuing and why?
- What are the key challenges and/or barriers that operators are facing?
- Given the challenges and inherent complexity, how can they overcome them?
Our findings are based on an interview programme with telecoms operators globally. For more information and to access the full report, please use the link here.
Author: Yesmean Luk is a Principal Consultant at STL Partners, specialising in all things Telco Cloud
Telco Cloud insights pack
This 24-page document will provide you with a summary of our insights from our virtualisation research and consulting work:
- Overview of Telco Cloud deployments worldwide
- Benefits of telco cloud: state of the industry
- Deployment approaches: implications and challenges
- How STL Partners can support you
Just click on the button below to request your free pack.
Read more about Telco Cloud, Cloud Native, NFV & SDN
Open RAN: What should telcos do?
Alongside the roll-out of 5G cores and radios, the Radio Access Network (RAN) is evolving to a more open, virtualised and distributed architecture. What are the opportunities and risks for telcos?